![]() |
lambda to afr maybe I'm missing something, but how do you switch from lambda values to afr values? |
In the app... I don't think you can. However, mathematically you can do Lambda x 14.7 and that will give you the AFR for that lambda. If you want to go AFR to Lambda then do AFR / 14.7 and you'll have your lambda value. |
Quote:
If it's that much of a problem then copy/paste to an excel/openoffice/whatever, multiply everything by 14.7, edit it, divide by 14.7 when you finish, paste back into Versa. You don't need to do this very often but over time I came to "learn" some values so that I don't have to divide/multiply by 14.7 every time. |
1 Attachment(s) There's literally hundreds of pages about this online. |
Quote:
That's exactly what i done. I just done the entire table in AFR and divided the table by 14.7. Pretty simple to do. I was just hoping there was an easy toggle. I'm not exactly the best at spotting small options. |
That feature is highly requested and will be incorporated in one of the future releases. Sorry about the inconvenience. |
Incoming WIN! The E85 guys will have to be more careful when working in AFR numbers instead of lambda, but usually at this level people know what they do. |
Shouldn't be much of a change over AFR, since it will still be a direct translation from Lambda. Changing the scalars will change the injection amount so you don't have to fuck with AFRs much. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
vB.Sponsors