Mazdaspeed Forums

Mazdaspeed Forums (http://www.mazdaspeedforum.org/forum/forum/)
-   Stratified Automotive Controls (http://www.mazdaspeedforum.org/forum/forum/f600/)
-   -   Another Happy Stratified Customer!!! (http://www.mazdaspeedforum.org/forum/forum/f600/another-happy-stratified-customer-199445/)

Ryan1926 03-02-2016 06:27 PM

Another Happy Stratified Customer!!!
 
1 Attachment(s)
I just want to say thanks to @Lex; at Stratified for helping me transform my Speed3 from an already capable car on 91 Octane to a beast on a custom E30 Tune. It was a pleasure working with Alex on my custom 91 and E30 eTunes. Alex was very professional and explained things as we worked on the tune and made sure that he catered to my needs with regards to maximizing my tunes based on my car being my daily driver. I can't believe how much of a difference an E85 blend makes on these cars. The torque is simply amazing! Thanks again Alex and if anyone if on the fence about doing an E85 blend custom tune, don't hesitate and be sure to drop Alex a message! Happy Boosting!

gdawg25 03-02-2016 06:59 PM

307 on 91 Cali piss on BNR S3?

hollar1211 03-02-2016 07:14 PM

So you got roughly 80 hp and 80 tq from an e30 blend? Was anything else installed since the 91 octane tune? Great numbers.

Ryan1926 03-02-2016 07:23 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attached is a real dyno pull I did on 91 octane prior to doing the E30 blend. I'm probably going to go back to the same dyno and do a pull on E85 to compare. So, I'm hoping an actual pull on my E85 blend will be proportional to the Virtual Dyno #'s.

To answer the 2 questions in the previous posts....

(1) yes...BNR S3 on 91 Oct.

(2) No additional mods were done. Alex and I did the 91 octane tune first then a month later did the E30 tune.

Lex 03-04-2016 05:04 PM

Pleasure was mine Ryan and looking forward to the updated dyno numbers!

Ryan1926 03-04-2016 07:07 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Found the video of the run as well.

Ryan1926 03-16-2016 08:31 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attached is an acutal dyno pull after the E85 blend tune by Alex. This was done on the same dyno as my initial 91 Octane run as evident by the baseline graph.

CWP_MS3 03-17-2016 05:55 AM

Meth too or just e85?

Nitro 03-17-2016 09:29 AM

Ryan 1926 what were your final numbers. The link you posted does not open.

Ryan1926 03-17-2016 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CWP_MS3 (Post 3035609)
Meth too or just e85?

Just the E85 Blend


Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitro (Post 3035675)
Ryan 1926 what were your final numbers. The link you posted does not open.

Weird....the .pdf shows up and opens up on my end. Final #'s were...

91 Oct - 320whp / 352tq

E85 Blend - 391whp / 386tq

Nitro 03-17-2016 09:47 AM

Thanks Ryan 1926

Ryan1926 03-17-2016 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitro (Post 3035681)
Thanks Ryan 1926

No problem. I see that you have a similar set-up as well as meth. What were your #'s?

Nitro 03-17-2016 10:05 AM

My numbers are around 341tq / 350hp. Tune is not complete although Alex feels this is a good safe place. I have to run some more logs for him. The numbers seem low compared to yours. I am running Shell 92, E85, and meth. Can you post a recent log? I would like to compare them.

Ryan1926 03-17-2016 10:45 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitro (Post 3035694)
My numbers are around 341tq / 350hp. Tune is not complete although Alex feels this is a good safe place. I have to run some more logs for him. The numbers seem low compared to yours. I am running Shell 92, E85, and meth. Can you post a recent log? I would like to compare them.

No Problem. Attached is the log from the actual Dyno run as well as 2 logs I sent to Alex after my last E85 revision.

Nitro 03-17-2016 10:51 AM

Thx. 2 things that are likely making the difference is your intake and exhaust. I have a 3 inch JBR and stock catback.

Ryan1926 03-17-2016 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitro (Post 3035714)
Thx. 2 things that are likely making the difference is your intake and exhaust. I have a 3 inch JBR and stock catback.

I see. Time to open her up then. :01:

CWP_MS3 03-17-2016 11:22 AM

Different people probably asking for different things. If Alex is saying he likes the level of power you're at, I'd be willing to bet its based off of what he feels matches what you asked from him.

Just saying. I know the poor tuners catch the brunt of it. The customer sees someone else make way more power than them, and they're like well WTF. Well, you wanted safety and they wanted power. lol Can't get all the powerz and none the risks...

Nitro 03-17-2016 12:46 PM

CWP_MS3 I know Alex very well. This is not meant to complain at all. He is an excellent tuner. I am just curious on the difference considering the quality of fuel used on a 91 tune. I am more than happy with the way the car runs:)

Lex 03-18-2016 10:08 AM

The differences you guys are seeing here mostly come down to the dyno you tested on. Ryan had his car run on a Dynapack while Nitro tested his car on a Mustang dyno.

The two are on opposite sides of the spectrum in terms of how they read; the Dynapack being known to read high and Mustang to read low.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
vB.Sponsors

©Copyright 2008 ; 2019 Cymru Internet Services LLC | FYHN™ Autosports HQ
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger

Page generated in 0.18323 seconds with 11 queries